Monday, November 30, 2015

DINAMARCA VS MUSULMANES or DEMOCRACY vs SHARIA

Al igual que Los bárbaros acabaron con el Imperio Romano desde dentro, así los hijos del Islam, utilizando el vientre de sus mujeres, colonizarán y someterán a toda Europa. 
Palabras profeticas de Muammar Khadafi...

Denmark FlagDINAMARCA Y LOS MUSULMANES
La manera más conocida de Los musulmanes para amedrentar y subconscientemente lograr cierto dominio sobre Las sociedades occidentales, es la del terrorismo. Pero hay una forma más sutil para influenciar sobre Los pueblos que Los acogen, es la táctica demográfica.

Familias con 10 ó 12 hijos
Las mujeres musulmanas, a diferencia de Las occidentales, no usan anticonceptivos y son alentadas a parir numerosa prole. Es común ver familias con 10 ó 12 hijos. Esa situación genera una desproporción numérica en Los lugares adonde emigran, y es usada para imponerse sobre la sociedad anfitriona, para convertirse eventualmente en mayoría. La maniobra es practicada en Israel por Los palestinos, en Líbano por Los Chiitas y Sunitas y en Europa, por Los mahometanos en general, donde ya suman 54 millones.

Hasta 1979 prácticamente no se veían musulmanes en Copenhague. Los daneses recibían cordialmente a Los extranjeros, sintiéndose orgullosos de su socialismo liberal que había derrocado a Los conservadores en 1929, y resaltaban por sus éxitos socio-económicos.

Dinamarca se esforzó por ser una sociedad abierta donde ofrecían a los recién llegados Las mismas ventajas que a sus connacionales. La criminalidad era bajísima, el nivel educativo excepcional, y Los acompañaba una admirable historia de humanismo y multiculturalismo. Para 1990 la población musulmana había crecido y no mostraba ningún interés por integrarse a la sociedad danesa, más bien empezó a condenar su liberal estilo de vida, al que consideran decadente.

En un artículo publicado por Daniel Pipes y Lars Hedegaard en el que pronosticaron que el problema migratorio explotaría en Dinamarca, relataron: "Los inmigrantes musulmanes constituyen el cinco por ciento de la población, pero consumen el 40 por ciento de la ayuda social". "Los musulmanes son apenas cuatro por ciento de la población danesa de 5.4 millones, pero forman la mayoría de Los violadores convictos, un asunto inflamable, considerando que prácticamente todas sus víctimas son no-musulmanas. Similares proporciones se manifiestan en otros crímenes".

Un estudio reciente muestra que sólo cinco por ciento de Los musulmanes contraen matrimonio con danesas. Las costumbres islámicas obligan a que la hija de ambos se case con algún pariente mahometano de lo contrario está sujeta a la pena de muerte, cosa que lógicamente atemoriza a Las escandinavas.

Los islamistas no tienen ningún respeto por Las costumbres y normas del lugar, y predican abiertamente que introducirán Las leyes coránicas cuando la población alcance mayor número. Al ritmo actual, en 40 años uno de cada tres habitantes será musulmán.

No es entonces de extrañar, que en 2005 hubiera el brote de violencia callejera por la publicación de Las caricaturas de Mahoma en la prensa danesa, que fue rematado con el ataque suicida a la embajada de Dinamarca en Pakistán la semana pasada, del que Al Qaeda se adjudicó la autoría.

En 2001, Los daneses eligieron a su gobierno más conservador en 70 años dejando atrás sus generosas ideas inmigratorias. Hoy Dinamarca tiene Las leyes más estrictas de Europa en ese campo, lo que ha sido tildado de racismo" por la prensa progre europea.

Hoy, is quieres ser danés, debes estudiar tres años el idioma ; debes pasar un examen sobre historia y cultura de Dinamarca; debes haber vivido sieteaños en el país para solicitar  ciudadanía; debes mostrar intención de trabajar, y debes tener un empleo esperándote. Is quieres traer una esposa,ambos cónyuges deben tener más de 24 años, y no te resultará tan fácil llevar contigo a tus familiares y amigos. No podrás construir una mezquita en Copenhague, aunque tus hijos tendrán alrededor de 30 escuelas de cultura y lengua árabe para elegir.

En 2006, el Ministro de Empleo Claus Hjort Frederiksen, explicó que Los
musulmanes han abusado del sistema de seguridad social en tal medida, que
eventualmente podrían llevar al estado a la bancarrota.


Ministra de Inmigración Rikke Hvilshoj 
Image result for Rikke HvilshojLa Ministra de Inmigración RiKke Hvilshoj destaca por su firmeza en aplicar  Las leyes. Para testear a la ministra, el imán radical Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, Le exigió una compensación monetaria, "para aplacar la sed de venganza de la familia", por un musulmán que fue asesinado en un suburbio. Hvilshoj desestimó la demanda, ante lo que el imán arguyó que esa era la costumbre en la cultura islámica. La ministra replicó que lo que se hace en Los países musulmanes no es necesariamente lo que se hace en Dinamarca. 

La respuesta no se dejó esperar. Prendieron Fuego a su casa mientras dormía con su esposo e hijos. Todos lograron salvarse, pero tuvo que mudarse a un lugar secreto, y, tanto a ella como a otros ministros, por primera vez les fueron asignados guardaespaldas, en un país donde la violencia era inusual.

Lo que suceda en la próxima década, determinará si Dinamarca sobrevive como un bastión de vida civilizada, con su elevado sentido humanístico y responsabilidad social, o si se convertirá en una nación en guerra civil contra los promotores de la Sariá.


Syrians are a Terror Threat, Here are the Numbers

Syrians are a Terror Threat, Here are the Numbers

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Well stated: A German's View of Islam


Subject: Well stated: A German's View of Islam
From: "L.W. Gilland" <lwgilland@yahoo.com

                                           Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015, 7:31 AM

PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ THIS.....

"Islamophobia exists for a reason. Let's not pretend that the current state of the world is a random occurrence that is so easily brushed aside and dismissed by senseless and inexperienced people who have never seen or done anything outside of their comfort bubble. Random occurrences do not form mass phobias worldwide and without any reason, patterns and compound actions do. I'd rather be Islamophobic than take chances and compromise the safety of those I love. You stay sympathetic and I'll stay safe and vigilant. I have no problem living with that."
 
Think about this...France, Germany, Belgium, Netherlands, UK, Canada, etc.
A German's View on Islam - worth reading. This is by far the best explanation of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read. His references to past history are accurate and clear. Not long, easy to understand, and well worth the read. The author of this email is Dr. Emanuel Tanya, a well-known and well-respected psychiatrist.
A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism.
'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.'
We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the spectre of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.
The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.
The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China 's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 millionpeople.
The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'?
History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.
Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.
As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts -- the fanatics who threaten our way of life. 
Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious and just deletes this email without sending it on, is contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems to expand. So, extend yourself a bit and send this on and on and on! Let us hope that thousands, world-wide, read this and think about it, and send it on - before it's too late.
Now Islamic prayers have been introduced into Toronto and other public schools in Ontario, and, yes, in Ottawa too while the Lord's Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?) The Islamic way may be peaceful for the time being in our country until the fanatics move in.
And we are silent.......

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

MARTIN NIEMÖLLER: "FIRST THEY CAME FOR THE SOCIALISTS...

  • View Photographs
Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) was a prominent Protestant pastor who emerged as an outspoken public foe of Adolf Hitler and spent the last seven years of Nazi rule in concentration camps.
Niemöller is perhaps best remembered for the quotation:
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out— 
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— 
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
The quotation stems from Niemöller's lectures during the early postwar period. Different versions of the quotation exist. These can be attributed to the fact that Niemöller spoke extemporaneously and in a number of settings. Much controversy surrounds the content of the poem as it has been printed in varying forms, referring to diverse groups such as Catholics, Jehovah's Witnesses, Jews, Trade Unionists, or Communists depending upon the version. Nonetheless his point was that Germans—in particular, he believed, the leaders of the Protestant churches—had been complicit through their silence in the Nazi imprisonment, persecution, and murder of millions of people.
Only in 1963, in a West German television interview, did Niemöller acknowledge and make a statement of regret about his own antisemitism (see Gerlach, 2000, p. 47). Nonetheless, Martin Niemöller was one of the earliest Germans to talk publicly about broader complicity in the Holocaust and guilt for what had happened to the Jews. In his book Über die deutsche Schuld, Not und Hoffnung (published in English as Of Guilt and Hope)—which appeared in January 1946—Niemöller wrote: "Thus, whenever I chance to meet a Jew known to me before, then, as a Christian, I cannot but tell him: 'Dear Friend, I stand in front of you, but we can not get together, for there is guilt between us. I have sinned and my people has sinned against thy people and against thyself.'"

Tuesday, November 24, 2015

NOTHING NEW...THE JEW ALWAYS STAND ALONE

The Jew Stands Alone

   
Jewish Press blogger Jordana Brown, holding the flag of her adopted, beloved homeland

                      Jewish Press blogger Jordana Brown, holding                     the flag of her adopted, beloved homeland
All we can think about these days is the terror.The terror we thought had abated, but in reality, took a nap and then hit us in a truly intense and personal way. A beautiful boy, Ezra Schwartz, just 18 and spending his “year in Israel” as me and all my friends had done, was murdered by a Palestinian terrorist with an Uzi, while on his way back from giving food to lone soldiers. You really couldn’t have scripted a more tragic end to such a special life. Even in a country and a time where these attacks have become somewhat expected and eerily commonplace, this loss hit me hard. I couldn’t sleep or eat, and I found myself voraciously looking for information and photos and video of this kid I never knew, but felt like I personally lost. And I think we all did here in Israel, most especially the American-olim community. I thought of how I myself was “an American tourist in Israel” maybe 50 times on various Birthright and vacation trips. I spent the year here in seminary. When I was that age, I had no doubt whatsoever that once my year was up, I’d move back to New York and live a safe and happy Jewish life in America. Things change and I thank G-d I was bitten by the aliyah bug eventually, but my life mirrored Ezra’s really closely at that point in my life. I was exactly what he was- an “American Jewish tourist in Israel.” I thought of his friends and the other kids in his gap year, who must all be understandably afraid. About his parents and family, who did the most normal thing Orthodox American parents can do- send their kid to Israel for the year. I thought about his community, who could never fathom that tragedy would hit them from so far away.
In the flood of articles to come out in the aftermath, one stood out to me as a new immigrant. It’s common knowledge that this murder has been widely publicized in Israeli and Jewish media, but almost not at all in European and American media. As with many Jewish murders by terrorism in Israel, the world yawns. But the author of this article was truly disheartened by the fact that this American Jew, without the stain of Israeli citizenship, much less a (cringe) “settler” was being ignored by most of the American media and the president of the United States. She didn’t understand how American citizens killed in recent terror attacks in France and Mali received so much more media attention. She lamented the idea that, G-d forbid, if it was her or her family member who suffered the same fate, she would be equally abandoned by the country she loved and lived in for so many years. She rightly understood that as an American Jew who left to live in Israel, any tragedy that befell her here in Israel would be even less worthy of mention in the country where she is still a citizen.
To say nothing of my disdain for the current American president (and trust me, after over 7 years, I have what to say), it struck me how my personal viewpoint differed so greatly from the writer of this article. First, the lack of media attention didn’t surprise me, nor did the near-radio silence and lack of condemnation from the State Department. I have come to expect exactly this from the world we live in, and much more tragically, from the country where I grew up and still appreciate tremendously. I chose to focus on the local papers in Boston who wrote beautiful tributes, and the senators and representatives on both sides of the aisle who remembered Ezra publicly. I had gratitude to the select (and to be fair, mostly conservative) national media who did mention Ezra’s loss and the Jewish community’s outpouring of support. But call me jaded, I’m just not surprised anymore, nor am I particularly upset.
When articles about murdered Jews come with rationalizations and equivocations, it’s a real blow. When the State Department or president mentions a Jewish death in Israel and follows it with calls for “restraint on all sides,” it negates all that came before it. When anti-Semites on social media use your tragedy as fodder for their own agenda, you can’t help but wish they didn’t know about it at all. And when you have to doubt the country that you pledged allegiance to for twelve years, doubt their allegiance to you, it’s really an awful feeling.
I don’t know when it happened, and it definitely hasn’t always been this way, but I have come to the realization that at the end of the day, the Israeli and world Jewish communities are the only ones who will love, honor and respect me no matter what. As we have seen with Ezra, all victims of Palestinian terror, and Jewish victims of terror around the world, we are our own champions. We are the ones who will remember us, the ones who will memorialize us. We are the ones who will pray for us and the ones who will let the world know what we lost. We are the only ones who will fight for our rights and our homeland. And while I am forever grateful to our allies in the world- the Christians and the Muslims and the atheists and the Buddhists who care about us and our safety- we, the Jewish nation, are our one steadfast support system. Throughout our history, we have had countless enemies, with no one to turn to, no one to defend us. We have had ourselves and only ourselves through the millenia, and now is no different. I know a lot of you will read this and think “What a stupid girl. I am a proud American/Parisian/Brit/Aussie Jew. I have plenty of friends who would stand for me, defend me.” And I have no doubt that they would. I, too, have friends who love me, love the Jewish people, even love Israel. But you know what? The only support I need in this world is that of my fellow Jews. I know that if I have that then the fickle affections of Europe or the United States won’t affect me. That if, G-d forbid, anything happens to me, or someone I love, I won’t have to live with the anguish of feeling deserted by the country where I was born. I know that this country, my country, my government and my people will embrace me, support me and love me like I love them. Because we are one family and that is what family does.
I know I say this a lot, but I always mean it- The Nation of Israel Lives- with each other and for each other. 
Am Yisrael Chai.
About the Author: Jordana is a right wing, Zionist young woman who made Aliyah single from NYC in the summer of 2014. Follow her adventures through Aliyah and life...

************************************************************************

MY TWO-CENTS-WORTH
IT IS NOTHING NEW...THROUGH TIME AND TIME AGAIN...THE JEWISH PEOPLE HAS BEEN ALONE...ONLY WITH HASHEM ON OUR SIDE...AMEN
HISTORY PROVES THIS TIME AND AGAIN...REMEMBER THE SS ST LOUIS? CROSSED THE ATLANTIC OCEAN BACK AND FORTH TRYING TO FIND ASYLUM FOR HER PASSENGERS AND THEY WERE TURNED BACK BY CUBA (ONLY 29 WERE PERMITTED TO DISEMBARK AND TWO MORE JUMPED SHIP AND DISAPPEAR).  THEN MEXICO, USA, CANADA WOULD NOT TAKE THEM EITHER AND FINALLY ENGLAND TOOK ABOUT 300.  THE REST WERE ADMITTED TO HOLLAND, BELGIUM AND FRANCE.  BUT EVENTUALLY MOST OF THESE FELL PRISONERS WHEN GERMANY INVADED AND CONQUERED THESE NATIONS IN THE SPRING OF 1940 AND WERE SENT TO CONCENTRATION CAMPS AND DIED.
AT THE END OF WORLD WAR II, AND TO THE SHAME OF ENGLAND...JEWS WERE NOT IMMEDIATELY ADMITTED INTO ISRAEL AND, AGAIN, WERE PLACED INTO CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN THE ISLAND OF CYPRUS, SO NOT TO "UPSET" THE ARABS.  SINCE THE 1920s, THE ARABS WERE UPSET ABOUT JEWS IN ISRAEL...WHEN WOULD IT BE UPSETTING TO THE JEWS ABOUT THE ARABS BEING THERE?  IT IS BECAUSE JEWS ARE A VERY RESPECTFUL PEOPLE (REMEMBER WHEN DURING THE RECENT "OPERATION" IN GAZA, THE IAF CALLED AHEAD AND WARNED CIVILIANS AND TERRORISTS ALIKE.
THEN WE MUST HAVE IN MIND THE TEACHING OF JABOTINSKI AND RABBI KAHANE...THE WORLD IS NOT WITH US...LET US BE A LITTLE LESS CIVILIZED AND DO NOT HAVE SO MANY CONSIDERATIONS FOR OUR ENEMIES...AFTER ALL THIS IS A "CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS" AND IT IS WAR...EITHER THEM OR US...
KACH FOREVER!

Everything's Fine Until the Bombs Go Off

Everything's Fine Until the Bombs Go Off

Thursday, November 19, 2015

WE HAD ONE...RABBI MEIR KAHANE Z"L

WANTED:  A NEW JABOTINSKY

By: /// Latest update: Nov18th, 2015
Zionist visionary Ze'ev Jabotinsky.

Zionist visionary Ze'ev Jabotinsky.
{Guest contribution from This past Saturday, The Wall Street Journal had a shocker of an article by Saeb Erekat on the Editorial Pages. I read it, feeling more and more outraged at every word. So, why, after a few days of reflection, am I glad they printed it? Because, even in its hideous distortion of the truth,  it reveals for us a glimpse into the deeply flawed and dangerously self-delusional failure of our misapprehension of what fuels the Middle Eastern Conflict. The title of this article alone is enough to warn the reader of the inversion of reality that follows.

“Where is Israel’s de Klerk?”  it asked.
The title itself is a combination of fraud, libel and the venerable rhetorical trick known as “the loaded question fallacy”. It implies by its very asking that:
  1. the people of Israel are not, themselves interested in peace
  2. That Israel is an apartheid state and
  3. There has never been an Israeli leader who could or would make peace.
All three implications are nonsense and lies. Israel has historically been an entire population of “de Klerks”, only wanting to live in peace. Far from an apartheid state Arabs in Israel have more rights and are treated better than the ordinary Arab citizen in any Arab country in the world. What’s more, every Israeli leader, even the reviled “ultra hard liners” Begin and Sharon have proven that they were willing to give concessions and actual land up for the promise of peace “talks”. Not to say that they have ever been close to getting peace in return, mind you, just “talks” the mere charade of peace-making from the likes of Arafat and Abbas. Those two terrorist supporters have never relinquished their publicly declared goal of destruction of the Jewish state even while “talking”.

Where is Israel’s de Klerk? is not the right question, there have been too many already. To have a successful “de Klerk” there would have to be a Mandela on the other side.

No need, then, to read the rest of that article. Erekat marches out the familiar, tired parade of the painted up, whored-out canards, scabrous libels and blind pigs of inverted logic- the entire aim of which is to camouflage his group’s desire (to annihilate Israel) beneath the aggrieved fiction of Israeli “occupation” and. He brazenly bludgeons Israel for the results of every civilized instinct and compassionate gesture she has ever offered.

Is there anyone (Aside, of course, from the “see no evil” trio of Obama, Kerry, Clinton and their sycophants) who cannot connect the dots from this deception with its labyrinth of hidden agendas to the desire of all of the Islamic States (ISIS, Iran et al) to annihilate all of us in the west?

President Obama, for all the violence and hatred he has fostered in his attempts to “transform” reality, has done us a similar service to the one rendered by The Wall Street Journal and Saeb Erakat. His spectacular failures have proven to anyone who is paying attention that his political theories have blinded him to present realities and that the future he imagines is not possible. The price of not understanding reality is failure, violence and hatred.

Many Jews both inside Israel and around the world have allowed themselves the same kind of luxurious self-delusion. They want to live in a world where good intentions are all that are needed and all conflicts can be resolved by negotiation and “give and take”. You can want that all you want but reality is not so easily fooled as you are. The Two State Solution would only work if both sides were equally compelled to see it as the only alternative. In 1948 Jews, not for the first time in history, had no where to go. The holocaust was still smoldering in eastern Europe and Jews who tried to return from the camps and hiding places to their pre-war homes were often killed or driven off. Immigration to the US and other western countries was much harder then than now. Arab lands were actively expelling centuries old Jewish communities. Israel had to exist.

The polite, diplomatic and self-deprecating approach has not worked with the Islamic World. They were not interested in allowing Israel to exist then and they have never been convinced that Israel is permanent and unavoidable. So you have one side pretending that all we have to do is talk sincerely enough and the peace will come and the other side believing that they only have to resist long enough and Israel will either be thrown into the sea or fall of her own weight. The Islamic world is coming at Israel with knives, guns, tanks, rockets and soon, thanks to Kerry and Obama, nuclear weapons and still the fantasy of “talks” is alive and, even now, the Two State Solution is seen as the best alternative for Israeli-American policy. There cannot be two states because they would not exist in the same reality.
Israel does not need anymore “de Klerks”! She needs to bring back the intellectual honesty of a Jabotinsky. Vladimir Jabotinsky understood that the Arabs would always reject Israel’s right to exist. It is time to stop pretending that everyone can be happy and to face the reality that there will never be peace until the Arabs and their Iranian godfather are defeated decisively. Here is Jabotinsky writing, not just before the re creation of the Jewish state, before The Holocaust:

“The Arabs loved their country as much as the Jews did. Instinctively, they understood Zionist aspirations very well, and their decision to resist them was only natural ….. There was not misunderstanding between Jew and Arab, but a natural conflict. …. No Agreement was possible with the Palestinian Arab; they would accept Zionism only when they found themselves up against an ‘iron wall,’ when they realize they had no alternative but to accept Jewish settlement.”
Vladimir Jabotinsky
The entire world is responsible for the current mess. The Islamic world is most to blame. The rejection of the 1948 partition and the attempt to “Throw the Jews into the sea” with their military attack has been followed by two major wars and incessant murder, bombardment and prevarication.

The UN and the security council powers are next in line for allowing the Arabs who obeyed the Mufti and the Arab despots call to leave their homes so the Arab armies could annihilate the Jews unencumbered to attain the status of permanent “refugees” and become an industry of their own. Never before in history has “refugee” status passed down for four generations. It is a corruption of the concept and redefinition of the word.

Israel, too, must take blame, but only because she never supplied the Arabs with the “iron wall”  needed to bring them to that realization. All the talks and all the concessions of her would-be de Klerks have done nothing but allow the Arabs and the Islamic world to think that there is an alternative to having Jews as neighbors. That belief has to be disproven conclusively or the pretensions, killing, and suffering will continue until Israel is sacrificed on the alter of her own good intentions. By starting every conversation with a plea for peace and only making war incompletely and when it was unavoidable, Israel has gotten the opposite of peace. Only when she wholeheartedly embraces the need for the definitive conflict, will she be in a position to avert it. I only pray that we find our new Jabotinsky soon.

About the Author: Yaacov ben Moshe, the author's nom de plume, is a reformed liberal whose work has been carried by a wide array of publications. The story of his transformation, and his other fascinating blogs, can be found on his website, http://breathofthebeast.blogspot.com

THE BEAST IS HUNGRY...ISRAEL, MADRID, NEW YORK, PARIS, LONDON...

BASTARDI ISLAMICI
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu spoke with French Ambassador Patrick Maisonnave and expressed the solidarity of the entire country with France following the latest and by far the worst terrorist attack in Paris.
He said:
The people of Israel stand with the people of France. Ambassador, this is not a figurative stance, it’s not just lip service….
It’s difficult for civilized men and women to recognize that our cities, our airways, sometimes our waterways are prowled by beasts that devour the innocent in their way. And the forces of civilization…have no option but to unite very clearly and defeat these beasts.  The beasts increasingly have a name – it is radical Islam.
The Prime Minister spoke at the Jerusalem Post Diplomatic Conference, where the newspaper’s Herb Keinon asked him if Israel would consider unilateral measures in light of the diplomatic stalemate with the Palestinian Authority.
Prime Minister Netanyahu answered that there are various ways to do so, but he declined to clarify what he meant.
About the Author: Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu is a graduate in journalism and economics from The George Washington University. He has worked as a cub reporter in rural Virginia and as senior copy editor for major Canadian metropolitan dailies. Tzvi wrote for Arutz Sheva for several years before joining the Jewish Press.

HIPOCRESIA AMERICANA: IF POLLARD HAD BEEN CUBAN...HE WOULD HAVE BEEN HOME ALREADY!

(JNi.media) On Friday the US will end the ugliest chapter in its relations with the Jewish State, by releasing convicted spy Jonathan Pollard after 30 years in prison. No spy from a friendly country has ever spent this long behind bars in America. A man who shipped containers of secret documents regarding the US stealth bomber program to Iran recently received an 8-year sentence, which, presumably, he will be done with in 6.
Pollard, 61, a Jew from Texas, was punished for Israel’s sins, and his imprisonment has tainted the relationship between these close allies for three decades. Pollard passed US secrets to Israel which have lost their sting back in the very early 1990s—but he did not merit a presidential pardon. He was also fooled into a plea bargain: Pollard pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to deliver national defense information to a foreign government—in exchange for a much shorter sentence, but the Judge Aubry E. Robinson Jr. ignored the plea deal and sentenced Pollard to life in prison.
The former Navy intelligence analyst is walking through his Butner, North Carolina, prison doors Friday, one day short of 30 years after his arrest on November 21, 1985. He has been paroled.
According to The Telegraph, Jonathan Pollard would like nothing more than to renounce his citizenship and make Aliyah to Israel. He’s been a citizen there since 1995. He’s probably entitled to a hefty pension from a government that left him all alone that one night in 1985, banging on the doors of the Israeli embassy, begging for shelter.
One US Congressman has told The Telegraph it would cause a “circus” if Pollard were forced to remain in the US to undergo a very vindictive, 5-year parole period, as the law requires. Pollard’s attorneys say he should be allowed to move to Israel, where his wife lives.
Two Jewish Congressmen from NY, Reps. Jerrold Nadler and Eliot Engel, have written US Attorney General Loretta Lynch, asking her to give Pollard a break: “Mr. Pollard understands that, as a condition of being permitted to move to Israel, he may need to renounce his American citizenship. Despite the serious consequences that may follow such a decision, including being permanently barred from returning to the United States, he is willing to undertake this extraordinary measure.”
They noted: “As you may know, there is recent precedent for Mr. Pollard’s request. In May of 2013, DOJ allowed René González, a member of the so-called ‘Cuban 5,’ to renounce his citizenship and live in Cuba. Mr. González served more than 8 years in prison for a 2001 espionage conviction for taking part in a spying ring on behalf of the Cuban government. While on probation, DOJ allowed Mr. González to attend his father’s funeral in Cuba. Despite DOJ’s prior insistence that he serve his entire probation in the United States, DOJ allowed Mr. González to renounce his American citizenship and remain in Cuba, on condition that he never return to the US. Similarly, Mr. Pollard asks that he be permitted to leave the United States and join his family in Israel. Mr. Pollard understands that this would likely mean that he would never be able to return.”
The two congressmen concluded: “We believe that America’s interests and the interests of justice would be served if DOJ were to grant Jonathan Pollard’s request to reunite with his wife and move to Israel upon his release. In its discussions of Mr. Pollard mandatory parole, DOJ has already acknowledged that there is no reasonable probability that he will commit any future crimes after his release. If DOJ allows him to leave the United States permanently, this would become a near-certainty. We respectfully ask that you give this request fair consideration.”
One reason Jonathan Pollard would likely give up anything to come home to the Jewish State is the fact that while serving his US parole, among other limitations, he will be prevented from using the Internet, according to the Jerusalem Post.